Local photography adventures.

December 3rd, 2008

Unfortunately not Saturday since we’re going to NYC for the day, but a list of sites to be taken on:

  • Gritty downtown areas. South side of the city.
  • Jamesville rock quarry.
  • Train junction/station/whatever in East Syracuse, off of Fremont Rd between Kirkville and Manlius Center Rds.
  • Westcott Reservoir - off of Rte 5, south of Solvay. In fact, Solvay area in general - looks pretty industrial.
  • Finally climb that big set of stairs off of Euclid (Westminster Park)

That’s a good list for now I think. But first on the radar… NYC on Saturday.

The photoblog was definitely a good idea. My only worry is that I’ll concentrate a bit too much on that and not enough on the galleries themselves. I guess I will just be severely restricting what goes in there to trips or sets of more than 5 or so.

Photobloggin’

November 25th, 2008

I added a photoblog to the site after a minor redesign this week, another gallery update, and a general renewal of interest in photography.

So now the general layout is going to be as follows: major projects/adventures are going up on the gallery site, minor day-to-day photography is going up on the photoblog, and text thoughts/rants/etc are going up on this blog right here. Hopefully this will keep me more engaged on a daily basis.

RSS feeds are available for both the photoblog and this blog, so add them to your Google Reader or other RSS feed aggregator.

AddThis Feed Button - textblog
AddThis Feed Button - photoblog

Santa Says Relax

October 23rd, 2008

Via Fraction Magazine’s blog:

For those of us who don’t remember this time period… it seems like a whole different country now. Well, kind of. Not really. There will always be corporations trying to sell things to people and marketing them as being healthy when they clearly aren’t. Or saying they have health benefits when they don’t.

Never take medical advice from someone who is trying to sell you something.

This election.

October 20th, 2008

Were votin for the ni-!

All I have to say is . All I’ve ever seen in my adult life is the bitter divisions in our country, exploited on both sides but by far more explicitly by the right. I didn’t think we’d heal THIS quickly. I didn’t think that the Limbaughs and Hannitys would fade so quickly to the margins, but they have. They are a non-issue now. I’m really proud of this country. I hope that feeling will continue throughout the next four years.

Of course, for every one of these, it feels like there’s another of these. But I do feel that those attitudes are far more marginalized now than they were from ‘94 to ‘04.

Debate #3 Summary

October 16th, 2008

Edit: And a follow-up commentary:

I blame boomers.

October 9th, 2008

$640 billion spending measure? Eh, call me when it gets to 700.

October 1st, 2008

Well this just blew me away:

WASHINGTON — The Department of Homeland Security will proceed with the first phase of a controversial satellite-surveillance program, even though an independent review found the department hasn’t yet ensured the program will comply with privacy laws.

Congress provided partial funding for the program in a little-debated $634 billion spending measure that will fund the government until early March. For the past year, the Bush administration had been fighting Democratic lawmakers over the spy program, known as the National Applications Office.

The program is designed to provide federal, state and local officials with extensive access to spy-satellite imagery — but no eavesdropping — to assist with emergency response and other domestic-security needs, such as identifying where ports or border areas are vulnerable to terrorism.

Since the department proposed the program a year ago, several Democratic lawmakers have said that turning the spy lens on America could violate Americans’ privacy and civil liberties unless adequate safeguards were required.

A new 60-page Government Accountability Office report said the department “lacks assurance that NAO operations will comply with applicable laws and privacy and civil liberties standards,” according to a person familiar with the document. The report, which is unclassified but considered sensitive, hasn’t been publicly released, but was described and quoted by several people who have read it.

The report cites gaps in privacy safeguards. The department, it found, lacks controls to prevent improper use of domestic-intelligence data by other agencies and provided insufficient assurance that requests for classified information will be fully reviewed to ensure it can be legally provided.

So let me get this straight, American public/mainstream media: $634 billion spent on a satellite-based spying program that arguably compromises the civil liberties of up to and including everybody in this country = barely a blip on the radar. $700 billion spent to keep the economy alive and keep the country from turning into a flaming wreck on the side of the road is OH MY GOD WE’RE ALL FUCKED? Oh and by the way the $700 billion will mostly be seen again as the economy improves and the investments pay themselves off, whereas the $634 billion is just going to remain a huge hunk of metal in the sky that invades our privacy until it crashes and burns in the atmosphere on re-entry.

Billions for defense contractors = good. Billions to stave off depression = bad. Jesus christ.

When you didn’t think she could seem any stupider.

September 30th, 2008

IRC quote: “apparently being the most cunning politician in Alaska is like being the smartest guy at a nickelback concert”

Rachel Maddow speaks for me.

September 30th, 2008

I was thinking this all day yesterday: Who leads the Republican party right now?

Copy/paste crisis explanation

September 30th, 2008

This is a verbatim copy of a long, fantastic post on the SomethingAwful forums explaining the steps that led us through the era of subprime mortgages and the selling of mortgage backed securities to the current crisis. Forums user razzledazzle says:

It’s ridiculous to blame the crisis on the Community Reinvestment Act or ACORN or whatever. The central thesis seems to be that the government forced lenders to give loans to risky customers, when in fact lenders chose to give loans to risky customers because there was a vast amount of profit to be made. (Reasonable people can differ on whether the CRA is good policy in principle and in practice, but that’s really besides the point here.)

It works like this:

Read the rest of this entry »